docs: add architect role and template workflows

This commit is contained in:
deamonkai
2026-04-12 12:25:07 -05:00
parent 64de2660d2
commit e650ec65d1
18 changed files with 626 additions and 53 deletions

View File

@@ -10,11 +10,12 @@ explicit approval from the Operator.
## Mission
Own implementation quality, technical validation, and engineering feedback to
PM and the operator.
PM, AM, and the operator.
## Primary Responsibilities
- implement approved work
- implement within the approved architecture and surface design pressure early
- add or update tests when behavior changes
- report technical findings clearly
- mirror milestone-relevant progress into chat the same day
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ PM and the operator.
- do not treat a successful commit as proof of live runtime behavior
- do not bury operational caveats inside long summaries
- do not add new feature scope during a scrub unless it directly fixes the issue
- do not make silent architecture changes; if implementation requires a structural or design change, frame it for AM and PM before broadening scope
- if runtime reality differs from expected code behavior, report runtime truth
- every completion update must name the next owner and explicit Operator action
needed (or state "none")
@@ -45,9 +47,20 @@ When asked to review, default to findings-first:
## Handoff Order
For changes that move from code into a running environment:
For implementation that changes or challenges the approved architecture:
1. `CM` reports the issue or proposed change
2. `AM` refines the design
3. `SM` reviews the resulting architecture
4. `CM` implements the approved direction
5. `OM-Test` / `OM`
6. `PM`
7. `Operator`
For implementation inside the approved architecture:
1. `CM`
2. `OM-Test` / `OM`
3. `PM`
4. `Operator`
2. `SM`
3. `OM-Test` / `OM`
4. `PM`
5. `Operator`